[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8babe541-9409-7f66-e52b-922144c46fb0@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:57:31 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>, <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
<liguozhu@...ilicon.com>, <Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com>,
<gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>, <john.garry@...wei.com>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
<lipeng321@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/10] net: hns3: Support for dynamically
assigning tx buffer to TC
Hi, David
On 2017/9/22 9:41, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 19:21:44 +0800
>
>> @@ -1324,23 +1324,28 @@ static int hclge_alloc_vport(struct hclge_dev *hdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int hclge_cmd_alloc_tx_buff(struct hclge_dev *hdev, u16 buf_size)
>> +static int hclge_cmd_alloc_tx_buff(struct hclge_dev *hdev)
>> {
>> /* TX buffer size is unit by 128 byte */
>> #define HCLGE_BUF_SIZE_UNIT_SHIFT 7
>> #define HCLGE_BUF_SIZE_UPDATE_EN_MSK BIT(15)
>> struct hclge_tx_buff_alloc *req;
>> + struct hclge_priv_buf *priv;
>> struct hclge_desc desc;
>> + u32 buf_size;
>> int ret;
>> u8 i;
>>
>> req = (struct hclge_tx_buff_alloc *)desc.data;
>>
>> hclge_cmd_setup_basic_desc(&desc, HCLGE_OPC_TX_BUFF_ALLOC, 0);
>> - for (i = 0; i < HCLGE_TC_NUM; i++)
>> + for (i = 0; i < HCLGE_TC_NUM; i++) {
>> + priv = &hdev->priv_buf[i];
>> + buf_size = priv->tx_buf_size;
>> req->tx_pkt_buff[i] =
>> cpu_to_le16((buf_size >> HCLGE_BUF_SIZE_UNIT_SHIFT) |
buf_size is used here
>> HCLGE_BUF_SIZE_UPDATE_EN_MSK);
>> + }
>>
>> ret = hclge_cmd_send(&hdev->hw, &desc, 1);
>> if (ret) {
>
> Local variable 'buf_size' is assigned but never used in this function.
> And with 'buf_size' removed, 'priv' also becomes unused.
>
> If it gets used in a later patch, add it in that later patch.
>
> You can also declare the variables locally in the basic block of
> the for() loop.
You are right. Will do it if there is more comment coming, thanks for
reviewing .
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists