[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71c435e1-1a2a-014c-97fc-34469c487a2d@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:06:20 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, mst@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] virtio-net: support XDP_REDIRECT
On 2017年09月21日 06:02, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 09/19/2017 02:42 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> This patch tries to add XDP_REDIRECT for virtio-net. The changes are
>> not complex as we could use exist XDP_TX helpers for most of the
>> work. The rest is passing the XDP_TX to NAPI handler for implementing
>> batching.
>>
>> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> ---
> [...]
>
>> @@ -678,12 +711,20 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
>> }
>> break;
>> case XDP_TX:
>> - if (unlikely(!virtnet_xdp_xmit(vi, &xdp)))
>> + if (unlikely(!__virtnet_xdp_xmit(vi, &xdp)))
>> trace_xdp_exception(vi->dev, xdp_prog, act);
>> + else
>> + *xdp_xmit = true;
>> if (unlikely(xdp_page != page))
>> goto err_xdp;
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> goto xdp_xmit;
>> + case XDP_REDIRECT:
>> + err = xdp_do_redirect(dev, &xdp, xdp_prog);
>> + if (err)
>> + *xdp_xmit = true;
> Is this a typo? Should above be
>
> if (!err)
> *xdp_xmit = true;
>
> this would match the pattern in receive_small and also make more sense.
Right, will post a fix.
>
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> + goto xdp_xmit;
>> default:
>> bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
>> case XDP_ABORTED:
>> @@ -788,7 +829,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
>> }
>>
> [...]
>
> Otherwise looks good to me thanks for doing this.
>
> .John
>
Thanks for the reviewing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists