netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] rtnetlink: rtnl_have_link_slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <80ca6187-4a08-d65d-fe16-27dcf7c55e4c@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 23 Sep 2017 11:17:37 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] rtnetlink: rtnl_have_link_slave_info
 doesn't need rtnl

On 9/22/17 12:10 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Switch it to rcu.
> 
> rtnl_link_slave_info_fill on to other hand does need rtnl mutex for now so
> add an annotation to its caller as a reminder.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> ---
>  Change since v1:
>   - don't add ASSERT_RTNL to rtnl_link_slave_info_fill and
>   rtnl_link_info_fill they are only called via rtnl_link_fill.
> 
>  net/core/rtnetlink.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index 590823f70cc3..e6f9e36d9d5a 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -522,11 +522,15 @@ static size_t rtnl_link_get_af_size(const struct net_device *dev,
>  static bool rtnl_have_link_slave_info(const struct net_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct net_device *master_dev;
> +	bool ret = false;
>  
> -	master_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get((struct net_device *) dev);
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +	master_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu((struct net_device *)dev);
>  	if (master_dev && master_dev->rtnl_link_ops)
> -		return true;
> -	return false;
> +		ret = true;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int rtnl_link_slave_info_fill(struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -598,6 +602,8 @@ static int rtnl_link_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *dev)
>  	struct nlattr *linkinfo;
>  	int err = -EMSGSIZE;
>  
> +	ASSERT_RTNL();

Rather than sprinkling the ASSERT_RTNL why not just add a comment above
the function which is done in many places. Since this is really meant as
your notes as you remove rtnl usage a comment serves the same purpose.

> +
>  	linkinfo = nla_nest_start(skb, IFLA_LINKINFO);
>  	if (linkinfo == NULL)
>  		goto out;
> 


Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>