[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170923192636.3932-1-fw@strlen.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 21:26:30 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] rtnetlink: preparation patches for further rtnl lock pushdown/removal
First patch adds a rudimentary vrf test case.
Remaining patches split large rtnl_fill_ifinfo into smaller chunks
to better see which parts
1. require rtnl
2. do not require it at all
3. rely on rtnl locking now but could be converted
I removed all the ASSERT_RTNL spots that v1 and v2 added,
i will keep that back in my working branch since those
are just 'todo' markers for myself.
Eric Dumazet pointed out that qdiscs are now freed directly without
call_rcu so I dropped the patch that made this assumption from the series.
As the remaining patches did not see major changes vs. v2 I retained
all reviewed/acked-by tags from David Ahern.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists