[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170923192636.3932-7-fw@strlen.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 21:26:36 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 6/6] rtnetlink: rtnl_have_link_slave_info doesn't need rtnl
it can be switched to rcu.
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
---
Changes since v2: remove ASSERT_RTNL.
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index e858a2b48d7e..c69451964a44 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -522,11 +522,15 @@ static size_t rtnl_link_get_af_size(const struct net_device *dev,
static bool rtnl_have_link_slave_info(const struct net_device *dev)
{
struct net_device *master_dev;
+ bool ret = false;
- master_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get((struct net_device *) dev);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ master_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu((struct net_device *)dev);
if (master_dev && master_dev->rtnl_link_ops)
- return true;
- return false;
+ ret = true;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return ret;
}
static int rtnl_link_slave_info_fill(struct sk_buff *skb,
--
2.13.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists