netdev - RE: [RFC] endianness issues in drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN3PR0701MB15918FECAEB8503920850A7580650@BN3PR0701MB1591.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sun, 24 Sep 2017 14:34:19 +0000
From:   "Tayar, Tomer" <Tomer.Tayar@...ium.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "Elior, Ariel" <Ariel.Elior@...ium.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [RFC] endianness issues in drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed

> 	"qed: Utilize FW 8.10.3.0" has attempted some endianness annotations
> in that driver; unfortunately, either annotations are BS or the driver is genuinely
> broken on big-endian hosts.
[...]
> Is that driver intended to be used on big-endian hosts at all?

Thanks for taking the time to review our driver and pointing out these mistakes.
Support for BE machines is planned to be added but currently it is not available.
However, the structures which are used to abstract the HW carry endianity annotations.
Obviously, there are some misses and some annotations were added when not required.
We will prepare a patch that fixes the issues you pointed out and similar ones.