[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56dd80dc-6d3e-4063-a439-f8938c65c384@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:52:39 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sch_netem: faster rb tree removal
On 9/25/17 2:11 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:14:23 -0600
>
>> I made a simple program this morning and ran it under perf.
>
> If possible please submit this for selftests.
>
It is more of a microbenchmark of options to flush an rbtree than a
self-test. Further, it relies on the tools/lib/rbtree.c versus
lib/rbtree.c. The tools/lib version was imported by Arnaldo in July 2015
and is a out of date, though it is good enough to show the intent w.r.t.
flushing options.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists