[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170926164240.764a66ed@griffin>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:42:40 +0200
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: "Yang, Yi" <yi.y.yang@...el.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
"e@...g.me" <e@...g.me>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10] openvswitch: enable NSH support
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:52:41 +0800, Yang, Yi wrote:
> > + return ((ret != 0) ? false : true);
>
> But I don't think this is a problematic line from my understanding,
Why not:
return ((ret != 0 == true) ? false : true) == true;
?
Sigh. This is equal to:
return !ret;
which you should use.
Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists