[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52270348-67f1-4e7a-cd2f-9d611ae94064@solarflare.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:32:15 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, <ys114321@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] bpf/verifier: disassembly improvements
Fix the output of print_bpf_insn() for ALU ops that don't look like
compound assignment (i.e. BPF_END and BPF_NEG).
Sample output for a short test program:
0: (b4) (u32) r0 = (u32) 0
1: (dc) r0 = be32 r0
2: (84) r0 = (u32) -r0
3: (95) exit
processed 4 insns, stack depth 0
Edward Cree (2):
bpf/verifier: improve disassembly of BPF_END instructions
bpf/verifier: improve disassembly of BPF_NEG instructions
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists