lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:41:55 -0700
From:   Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:     Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Can libpcap filter on vlan tags when vlans are
 hardware-accelerated?

On 09/12/2017 01:26 PM, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:54:43AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>> It does not appear to work on Fedora-26, and I'm curious if someone
>> knows what needs doing to get this support working?
>
> It's rather complicated. The "vlan" and "vlan <id>" filters didn't
> handle the case when vlan information is passed in metadata until commit
> 04660eb1e561 ("Use BPF extensions in compiled filters"), i.e. libpcap
> 1.7.0. Unfortunately that commit made libpcap always check only metadata
> for the first outermost vlan tag so that it broke the case when vlan
> information is passed in packet itself (which is less frequent today).
>
> To handle both cases correctly, you would need libpcap with commits
> d739b068ac29 ("Make VLAN filter handle both metadata and inline tags")
> and 7c7a19fbd9af ("Fix logic of combined VLAN test") and also the
> optimizer fix from
>
>   https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/pull/582/commits/075015a3d17a
>
> (without it the filters generate incorrect BPF in some cases unless the
> optimizer is disabled). As far as I can see, these commits are not in
> any release yet.
>
>                                                        Michal Kubecek
>

So, I cloned the latest libpcap, and I'm going to start poking at this.

Do you happen to know if I need to do anything special other than
'pcap_compile()'?  I'm curious how the library would know if it can use
newer kernel API or not...or maybe it is somehow magically backwards/forward
compatible?

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ