[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170926223414.hdyveon53ev5dqi2@ast-mbp>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:34:16 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
ys114321@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] bpf/verifier: improve disassembly of
BPF_NEG instructions
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:35:29PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> BPF_NEG takes only one operand, unlike the bulk of BPF_ALU[64] which are
> compound-assignments. So give it its own format in print_bpf_insn().
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
thank you for the cleanup.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists