netdev - RE: [PATCH net v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: lock mutex when freeing IRQs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:06:01 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Vivien Didelot' <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel@...oirfairelinux.com" <kernel@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: lock mutex when freeing IRQs

From: Vivien Didelot
> Sent: 26 September 2017 19:57
> mv88e6xxx_g2_irq_free locks the registers mutex, but not
> mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free, which results in a stack trace from
> assert_reg_lock when unloading the mv88e6xxx module. Fix this.
> 
> Fixes: 3460a5770ce9 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Mask g1 interrupts and free interrupt")
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> index c6678aa9b4ef..e7ff7483d2fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -3947,7 +3947,9 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_remove(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
>  	if (chip->irq > 0) {
>  		if (chip->info->g2_irqs > 0)
>  			mv88e6xxx_g2_irq_free(chip);
> +		mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
>  		mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free(chip);
> +		mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);

Isn't the irq_free code likely to have to sleep waiting for any
ISR to complete??

	David