netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] ip_tunnel: add mpls over gre encapsulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1ce61dd3-293b-c26b-e173-3bdae4ba46a7@6wind.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2017 18:08:24 +0200
From:   Amine Kherbouche <amine.kherbouche@...nd.com>
To:     Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, xeb@...l.ru,
        David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] ip_tunnel: add mpls over gre encapsulation



On 09/27/2017 05:36 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> Amine, one small nit here.., if you define mpls_gre_rcv in gre header
> (like you had initially), you could do the below...
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPLS)
> mpls_gre_rcv()
> {
>      /* real func */
> }
> #else
> mpls_gre_rcv()
> {
>     kfree_skb(skb)
>     return NET_RX_DROP
> }
> #endif
>
> and the check in gre_rcv() reduces to
>
> if (unlikely(tpi.proto == htons(ETH_P_MPLS_UC)))
>         return mpls_gre_rcv(skb, hdr_len);
>
> Which looks much cleaner.

If I do that, do I have to add back the patch that export mpls_forward() 
or just merge it with this one ?