netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] libbpf: use map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <59CC201C.6090502@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:03:08 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     Chonggang Li <chonggangli@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] libbpf: use map_flags when creating maps

On 09/27/2017 06:29 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 9/27/17 7:04 AM, Craig Gallek wrote:
>> From: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
>>
>> This extends struct bpf_map_def to include a flags field.  Note that
>> this has the potential to break the validation logic in
>> bpf_object__validate_maps and bpf_object__init_maps as they use
>> sizeof(struct bpf_map_def) as a minimal allowable size of a map section.
>> Any bpf program compiled with a smaller struct bpf_map_def will fail this
>> check.
>>
>> I don't believe this will be an issue in practice as both compile-time
>> definitions of struct bpf_map_def (in samples/bpf/bpf_load.h and
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h) have always been larger
>> than this newly updated version in libbpf.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
>>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> index 35f6dfcdc565..6bea85f260a3 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> @@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ bpf_object__create_maps(struct bpf_object *obj)
>>                        def->key_size,
>>                        def->value_size,
>>                        def->max_entries,
>> -                      0);
>> +                      def->map_flags);
>>          if (*pfd < 0) {
>>              size_t j;
>>              int err = *pfd;
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
>> index 7959086eb9c9..6e20003109e0 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
>> @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ struct bpf_map_def {
>>      unsigned int key_size;
>>      unsigned int value_size;
>>      unsigned int max_entries;
>> +    unsigned int map_flags;
>>  };
>
> yes it will break loading of pre-compiled .o
> Instead of breaking, let's fix the loader to do it the way
> samples/bpf/bpf_load.c does.
> See commit 156450d9d964 ("samples/bpf: make bpf_load.c code compatible with ELF maps section changes")

+1, iproute2 loader also does map spec fixup

For libbpf it would be good also such that it reduces the diff
further between the libbpf and bpf_load so that it allows move
to libbpf for samples in future.