netdev - [patch net-next v3 05/12] net: ipmr: Add MFC offload indication

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170927062322.5476-6-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:23:15 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, yotamg@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        linyunsheng@...wei.com
Subject: [patch net-next v3 05/12] net: ipmr: Add MFC offload indication

From: Yotam Gigi <yotamg@...lanox.com>

Allow drivers, registered to the fib notification chain indicate whether a
multicast MFC route is offloaded or not, similarly to unicast routes. The
indication of whether a route is offloaded is done using the mfc_flags
field on an mfc_cache struct, and the information is sent to the userspace
via the RTNetlink interface only.

Currently, MFC routes are either offloaded or not, thus there is no need to
add per-VIF offload indication.

Signed-off-by: Yotam Gigi <yotamg@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
---
v1->v2:
 - Add comment for the MFC_OFFLOAD flag
---
 include/linux/mroute.h | 2 ++
 net/ipv4/ipmr.c        | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/mroute.h b/include/linux/mroute.h
index 54c5cb8..5566580 100644
--- a/include/linux/mroute.h
+++ b/include/linux/mroute.h
@@ -90,9 +90,11 @@ struct mr_table {
 
 /* mfc_flags:
  * MFC_STATIC - the entry was added statically (not by a routing daemon)
+ * MFC_OFFLOAD - the entry was offloaded to the hardware
  */
 enum {
 	MFC_STATIC = BIT(0),
+	MFC_OFFLOAD = BIT(1),
 };
 
 struct mfc_cache_cmp_arg {
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
index ba71bc4..2a795d2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -2268,6 +2268,9 @@ static int __ipmr_fill_mroute(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	    nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_IIF, mrt->vif_table[c->mfc_parent].dev->ifindex) < 0)
 		return -EMSGSIZE;
 
+	if (c->mfc_flags & MFC_OFFLOAD)
+		rtm->rtm_flags |= RTNH_F_OFFLOAD;
+
 	if (!(mp_attr = nla_nest_start(skb, RTA_MULTIPATH)))
 		return -EMSGSIZE;
 
-- 
2.9.5