[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170928.094118.1703457698817122114.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] inetpeer: speed up inetpeer_invalidate_tree()
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:14:14 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> As measured in my prior patch ("sch_netem: faster rb tree removal"),
> rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() is nice looking but much slower
> than using rb_next() directly, except when tree is small enough
> to fit in CPU caches (then the cost is the same)
>
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Applied, thanks Eric.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists