netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: add per-port group_fwd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170929.060418.1634372835635805803.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2017 06:04:18 +0100 (WEST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: add per-port group_fwd_mask with
 less restrictions

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 16:12:44 +0300

> We need to be able to transparently forward most link-local frames via
> tunnels (e.g. vxlan, qinq). Currently the bridge's group_fwd_mask has a
> mask which restricts the forwarding of STP and LACP, but we need to be able
> to forward these over tunnels and control that forwarding on a per-port
> basis thus add a new per-port group_fwd_mask option which only disallows
> mac pause frames to be forwarded (they're always dropped anyway).
> The patch does not change the current default situation - all of the others
> are still restricted unless configured for forwarding.
> We have successfully tested this patch with LACP and STP forwarding over
> VxLAN and qinq tunnels.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>

Applied, thanks.