netdev - Re: [PATCHv4 iproute2 1/2] lib/libnetlink: re malloc buff if size is not enough

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170929105440.7edaec1f@xeon-e3>
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:54:40 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Hangbin Liu <haliu@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 iproute2 1/2] lib/libnetlink: re malloc buff if size
 is not enough

On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 21:33:45 +0800
Hangbin Liu <haliu@...hat.com> wrote:

>  
> +static int __rtnl_recvmsg(int fd, struct msghdr *msg, int flags)
> +{
> +	int len;
> +
> +	do {
> +		len = recvmsg(fd, msg, flags);
> +	} while (len < 0 && (errno == EINTR || errno == EAGAIN));
> +
> +	if (len < 0) {
> +		fprintf(stderr, "netlink receive error %s (%d)\n",
> +			strerror(errno), errno);
> +		return -errno;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (len == 0) {
> +		fprintf(stderr, "EOF on netlink\n");
> +		return -ENODATA;
> +	}
> +
> +	return len;
> +}
> +
> +static int rtnl_recvmsg(int fd, struct msghdr *msg, char **answer)
> +{
> +	struct iovec *iov = msg->msg_iov;
> +	char *buf;
> +	int len;
> +
> +	iov->iov_base = NULL;
> +	iov->iov_len = 0;
> +
> +	len = __rtnl_recvmsg(fd, msg, MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC);
> +	if (len < 0)
> +		return len;
> +
> +	buf = malloc(len);
> +	if (!buf) {
> +		fprintf(stderr, "malloc error: not enough buffer\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	iov->iov_base = buf;
> +	iov->iov_len = len;
> +
> +	len = __rtnl_recvmsg(fd, msg, 0);
> +	if (len < 0) {
> +		free(buf);
> +		return len;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (answer)
> +		*answer = buf;
> +	else
> +		free(buf);
> +
> +	return len;
> +}

Doubling the number of system calls per message is not going to make
users with 5,000,000 routes or 1000 vlans, or 10,000 tunnels happy.
Please rethink this.