[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1640482.VEeSHCmrEB@philogene>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:51:49 +0300
From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net>
To: Lin Zhang <xiaolou4617@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, courmisch@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: phonet: mark phonet_protocol as const
On samedi 30 septembre 2017 17:40:48 EEST Lin Zhang wrote:
> The phonet_protocol structs don't need to be written by anyone and
> so can be marked as const.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Zhang <xiaolou4617@...il.com>
> ---
> changelog:
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * remove __read_mostly tag
> ---
> include/net/phonet/phonet.h | 6 ++++--
> net/phonet/af_phonet.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> net/phonet/datagram.c | 2 +-
> net/phonet/pep.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/phonet/phonet.h b/include/net/phonet/phonet.h
> index 039cc29..51e1a2a 100644
> --- a/include/net/phonet/phonet.h
> +++ b/include/net/phonet/phonet.h
> @@ -108,8 +108,10 @@ struct phonet_protocol {
> int sock_type;
> };
>
> -int phonet_proto_register(unsigned int protocol, struct phonet_protocol
> *pp); -void phonet_proto_unregister(unsigned int protocol, struct
> phonet_protocol *pp); +int phonet_proto_register(unsigned int protocol,
> + const struct phonet_protocol *pp);
> +void phonet_proto_unregister(unsigned int protocol,
> + const struct phonet_protocol *pp);
>
> int phonet_sysctl_init(void);
> void phonet_sysctl_exit(void);
> diff --git a/net/phonet/af_phonet.c b/net/phonet/af_phonet.c
> index b12142e..63b9870 100644
> --- a/net/phonet/af_phonet.c
> +++ b/net/phonet/af_phonet.c
> @@ -35,11 +35,11 @@
> #include <net/phonet/pn_dev.h>
>
> /* Transport protocol registration */
> -static struct phonet_protocol *proto_tab[PHONET_NPROTO] __read_mostly;
> +static const struct phonet_protocol *proto_tab[PHONET_NPROTO];
Your patch makes each element in the table constant. It does not, cannot, make
the table itself constant. So I am not certain that removing __read_mostly is
a good thing.
(Well, nowadays this should probably be rare-write rather than read-mostly but
that's a slightly different issue.)
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
Powered by blists - more mailing lists