[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEwTi7QkF73cc1hShzOoM9bzb5mBzyFW8t68OCn+XECrJ9d61Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:32:20 +0100
From: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 197099] New: Kernel panic in interrupt [l2tp_ppp]
This seems to be a NULL pointer exception caused by tunnel->sock being
NULL at the call to bh_lock_sock() in l2tp_xmit_skb() at
l2tp_core.c:1135.
tunnel->sock is set NULL in l2tp_core's tunnel socket destructor.
At the moment, I don't understand how this happens because
pppol2tp_xmit() does a sock_hold() on the tunnel socket before
l2tp_xmit_skb() is called. I'm still looking at this.
Has this problem only recently started happening?
On 1 October 2017 at 18:21, Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 16:22:33 +0000
> From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
> To: stephen@...workplumber.org
> Subject: [Bug 197099] New: Kernel panic in interrupt [l2tp_ppp]
>
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197099
>
> Bug ID: 197099
> Summary: Kernel panic in interrupt [l2tp_ppp]
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 4.8.13-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64
> Hardware: x86-64
> OS: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Other
> Assignee: stephen@...workplumber.org
> Reporter: svimik@...il.com
> Regression: No
>
> Created attachment 258685
> --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=258685&action=edit
> stacktrace screenshot
>
> Hello!
>
> Getting kernel panics on multiple servers. Since it mentions l2tp_core,
> l2tp_ppp and ppp_generic, I decided to report it to Networking (correct me if
> I'm wrong).
>
> Unfortunately I'm still struggling with making kdump work, so the trace
> screenshot is all I have at this moment. The only hope is that this stacktrace
> means something to the guys that wrote the code.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are the assignee for the bug.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists