[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171002154236.84043-8-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 08:42:30 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, jogreene@...hat.com,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 07/13] fm10k: add missing fall through comment
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Newer versions of GCC starting with 7 now additionally warn when a case
statement may fall through without an explicit comment mentioning it.
Add such a comment to silence the warning, as this is expected.
Unfortunately the comment must come directly before the next case
statement, so we put it outside the #ifdef. Otherwise, the compiler
cannot properly detect it and thus the warning is displayed regardless.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <krishneil.k.singh@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c
index 9dffaba85ae6..189d52a8a605 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c
@@ -876,6 +876,7 @@ static void fm10k_tx_csum(struct fm10k_ring *tx_ring,
case IPPROTO_GRE:
if (skb->encapsulation)
break;
+ /* fall through */
default:
if (unlikely(net_ratelimit())) {
dev_warn(tx_ring->dev,
--
2.14.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists