netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] bridge: neigh msg proxy and flood suppression support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171002110224.4d789600@xeon-e3>
Date:   Mon, 2 Oct 2017 11:02:24 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] bridge: neigh msg proxy and flood
 suppression support

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 07:49:09 -0700
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> > From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> >
> > This series implements arp and nd suppression in the bridge
> > driver for ethernet vpns. It implements rfc7432, section 10
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7432#section-10
> > for ethernet VPN deployments. It is similar to the existing
> > BR_ARP_PROXY flag but has a few semantic differences to conform
> > to EVPN standard. In case of EVPN, it is mainly used to avoid flooding to
> > tunnel ports like vxlan/mpls. Unlike the existing flags it suppresses flood
> > of all neigh discovery packets (arp, nd) to tunnel ports.
> >
> > Roopa Prabhu (3):
> >   bridge: add new BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS port flag to suppress arp and nd
> >     flood
> >   neigh arp suppress first
> >   bridge: suppress nd messages from going to BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS ports
> >  
> 
> pls ignore, shows conflict applying over recent net-next bridge
> changes. Will rebase and submit v2.

Ok, but the concept looks good.