netdev - Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] flow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Oct 2017 22:04:09 +0200
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To:     Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] flow_dissector: dissect
 tunnel info

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 12:36:33PM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com> wrote:
> > Move dissection of tunnel info from the flower classifier to the flow
> > dissector where all other dissection occurs.  This should not have any
> > behavioural affect on other users of the flow dissector.

...

> > +static void
> > +__skb_flow_dissect_tunnel_info(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> > +                              struct flow_dissector *flow_dissector,
> > +                              void *target_container)
> > +{
> > +       struct ip_tunnel_info *info;
> > +       struct ip_tunnel_key *key;
> > +
> > +       /* A quick check to see if there might be something to do. */
> > +       if (!dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
> > +                               FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_KEYID) &&
> > +           !dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
> > +                               FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_IPV4_ADDRS) &&
> > +           !dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
> > +                               FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_IPV6_ADDRS) &&
> > +           !dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
> > +                               FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL) &&
> > +           !dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
> > +                               FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_PORTS))
> > +               return;
> 
> This complex conditional is now in the path of every call to flow
> dissector regardless of whether a classifier is enabled or tunnels
> are. What does the assembly show in terms of number of branches? Can
> we at least get this down to one check (might be a use case for
> FLOW_DISSECTOR_F_FLOWER ;-) ), or even better use the static key when
> encap or is enabled?

Hi Tom,

it appears to me (a little to my surprise but I did check before
posting) that the compiler turns the above into a single comparison.

$ gcc --version
gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.