[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87infwtd0b.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:25:08 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>
Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: br: Fix igmp snooping offload with CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
>> The vlan will be effective only when vlan_filtering is enabled.
>> When vlan_filtering is disabled, vlan information is still kept in the
>> bridge and gets effective later when vlan_filtering becomes enable.
>
> O.K, so things are starting to get clearer.
>
> So when vlan filtering is disabled, the hardware should just ignore
> the requests to add the vlan to the hardware?
>
> When vlan_filtering is enabled, are all the vlans in the software
> bridge again offloaded? Or do we need to remember all the vlans which
> we ignored while vlan filtering was disabled? The average switch has
> nowhere to store these disabled vlans. It can only store active vlans.
When vlan_filtering is enabled on the bridge, the bridge code does
propagates the default_pvid again if I recall correctly.
In my opinion the hardware mustn't ignore the VLAN requests, because we
seem to agree that vlan_filtering disabled means that the target ports
should not care yet about 802.1Q. So having some unused hardware VLAN
entries and some ports with disabled 802.1Q mode must work together.
That being said we still have the wrong hardware FDB populated when
CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING is enabled but not vlan_filtering...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists