lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171003164003.f5yay2oe6dhxnump@alphalink.fr>
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:40:03 +0200
From:   Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
To:     Beniamino Galvani <bgalvani@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Gao Feng <gfree.wind@....163.com>
Subject: Re: BUG in free_netdev() on ppp link deletion

On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 09:44:14AM +0200, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
>  Call Trace:
>   ppp_destroy_interface+0xd8/0xe0 [ppp_generic]
>   ppp_disconnect_channel+0xda/0x110 [ppp_generic]
>   ppp_unregister_channel+0x5e/0x110 [ppp_generic]
>   pppox_unbind_sock+0x23/0x30 [pppox]
>   pppoe_connect+0x130/0x440 [pppoe]
>   SYSC_connect+0x98/0x110
>   ? do_fcntl+0x2c0/0x5d0
>   SyS_connect+0xe/0x10
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa5
>  RIP: 0033:0x7fa71f4af840
>  RSP: 002b:00007ffe4ea40bf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a
>  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000556d37ae0538 RCX: 00007fa71f4af840
>  RDX: 000000000000001e RSI: 00007ffe4ea40c00 RDI: 0000000000000008
>  RBP: 0000556d37b2a1b0 R08: 0000556d396e95b0 R09: 0000000000000008
>  R10: 00000000aaaaaaab R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000556d37adc008
>  R13: 0000556d37adc004 R14: 0000556d37b2a1a4 R15: 0000000000000000
>  Code: 04 00 00 04 e8 cb 52 e3 ff 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d c3 41 0f b7 84 24 32 02 00 00 4c 89 e7 48 29 c7 e8 80 8b aa ff 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d c3 <0f> 0b 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 57 41 
>  RIP: free_netdev+0x107/0x110 RSP: ffffc28a40573d88
>  ---[ end trace ed294ff0cc40eeff ]---
> 
> To reproduce this, establish a PPP connection through pppd, then bring
> down and delete the ppp interface:
> 
>  # pppd nodetach lock user client plugin rp-pppoe.so ens11 noauth nodeflate password password &
>  Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.
>  RP-PPPoE plugin version 3.8p compiled against pppd 2.4.7
>  PPP session is 16
>  Connected to fe:54:00:5f:04:13 via interface ens11
>  Using interface ppp0
>  Connect: ppp0 <--> ens11
>  CHAP authentication succeeded: Access granted
>  CHAP authentication succeeded
>  peer from calling number FE:54:00:5F:04:13 authorized
>  local  IP address 3.1.1.10
>  remote IP address 3.1.1.1
> 
>  # ip l set ppp0 down
>  # ip l del ppp0
> 
> It does not happen every time but only when ppp_destroy_interface() is
> called with dev->reg_state = UNREGISTERING, set by the concurrent
> rtnl_delete_link().
> 
Indeed, we have a race here: ppp_destroy_interface() can be called before
netdev_run_todo() completes. I'm working on it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ