[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171004202749.GB13247@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 22:27:49 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Richard Siegfried <richard_siegfried@...temli.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] A own subdirectory for shared TCP code
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:54:17PM +0200, Richard Siegfried wrote:
> On 04/10/17 01:03, David Miller wrote:
> > As someone who has to do backports regularly to -stable, there is no way
> > I am applying this.
> >
> > Sorry.
> Okay, I see.
>
> Is grouping files into subdirectories something generally
> unwanted/unlikely to be applied or is this specific to TCP / networking?
>
> Because there are several other places in the source tree where I would
> like to group things.
Hi Richard
It is generally unwanted.
Have you tried back porting patches when the directory structure has
changed? Files have moved around? It makes it a lot harder to
do. Meaning patches are going to be back ported less often. Fixes
which could be security relevant might not get back ported, etc.
Kernel 4.4 is going to be supported until 2022. So moving files around
is going to make Greg Kroah-Hartman life more difficult for the next 5
years.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists