[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4a04560-07c8-7d9e-d64c-558f99cfc653@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:21:35 +0900
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] bridge: add new
BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS port flag to suppress arp and nd flood
On 2017/10/04 14:12, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>
> This patch adds a new bridge port flag BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS to
> suppress arp and nd flood on bridge ports. It implements
> rfc7432, section 10.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7432#section-10
> for ethernet VPN deployments. It is similar to the existing
> BR_ARP_PROXY flag but has a few semantic differences to conform
> to EVPN standard. In case of EVPN, it is mainly used to
> avoid flooding to tunnel ports like vxlan. Unlike the existing
> flags it suppresses flood of all neigh discovery packets
> (arp, nd) to tunnel ports.
>
> This patch adds netlink and sysfs support to set this bridge port
> flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> index dea88a2..d8c2706 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static inline size_t br_port_info_size(void)
> + nla_total_size(1) /* IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP */
> + nla_total_size(1) /* IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP_WIFI */
> + nla_total_size(1) /* IFLA_BRPORT_VLAN_TUNNEL */
> + + nla_total_size(1) /* IFLA_BRPORT_NEIGH_SUPPRESS */
> + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct ifla_bridge_id)) /* IFLA_BRPORT_ROOT_ID */
> + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct ifla_bridge_id)) /* IFLA_BRPORT_BRIDGE_ID */
> + nla_total_size(sizeof(u16)) /* IFLA_BRPORT_DESIGNATED_PORT */
> @@ -210,7 +211,9 @@ static int br_port_fill_attrs(struct sk_buff *skb,
> nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_CONFIG_PENDING, p->config_pending) ||
> nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_VLAN_TUNNEL, !!(p->flags &
> BR_VLAN_TUNNEL)) ||
> - nla_put_u16(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_GROUP_FWD_MASK, p->group_fwd_mask))
> + nla_put_u16(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_GROUP_FWD_MASK, p->group_fwd_mask) ||
> + nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_NEIGH_SUPPRESS, !!(p->flags &
> + BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS)))
Wouldn't it be better to make the indentation like this?
... !!(p->flags &
BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS)))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
>
> timerval = br_timer_value(&p->message_age_timer);
> @@ -692,6 +695,7 @@ static int br_setport(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *tb[])
> {
> unsigned long old_flags = p->flags;
> bool br_vlan_tunnel_old = false;
> + int neigh_suppress_old = 0;
> int err;
>
> err = br_set_port_flag(p, tb, IFLA_BRPORT_MODE, BR_HAIRPIN_MODE);
> @@ -785,6 +789,12 @@ static int br_setport(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *tb[])
> p->group_fwd_mask = fwd_mask;
> }
>
> + neigh_suppress_old = (p->flags & BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS);
> + br_set_port_flag(p, tb, IFLA_BRPORT_NEIGH_SUPPRESS,
> + BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS);
> + if (neigh_suppress_old != (p->flags & BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS))
> + br_recalculate_neigh_suppress_enabled(p->br);
> +
You are calling br_recalculate_neigh_suppress_enabled() from within
br_port_flags_change() immediately after this.
I think you can just call br_set_port_flag() here.
> br_port_flags_change(p, old_flags ^ p->flags);
> return 0;
> }
--
Toshiaki Makita
Powered by blists - more mailing lists