[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171004114033.GJ25388@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:40:33 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] tools: add bpftool
Em Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 05:48:22PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski escreveu:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:19:42 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Why not call it just 'bpf'?
> bpftool was suggested as a better name, I don't really mind either way.
I just thought that 'bpf' isn't used as a command, shorter, less typing,
but yeah, if people think having 'tool' in the tool name helps somewhat,
so be it.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists