[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171005222159.GO13247@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 00:21:59 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
mark.rutland@....com, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
wens@...e.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
alexandre.torgue@...com, frowand.list@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/11] of: mdio: Prevent of_mdiobus_register from
scanning mdio-mux nodes
> Looking at this some more, why can't mdio-mux-mmio be used?
Hi Rob
That was my first thought. And then i dug into the details. The mux is
more than just a couple of bits in an address space. Clocks needs to
be enabled/disabled, and the MAC needs a reset, when the mux changes.
So the mux needs intimate knowledge of MAC.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists