[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171005083437.v3yfluazdy5du7pi@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:34:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: yhs@...com, rostedt@...dmis.org, ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] bpf: add two helpers to read perf event
enabled/running time
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 04:00:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 15:42:14 -0700
>
> > [Dave, Peter,
> >
> > Previous communcation shows that this patch may potentially have
> > merge conflict with upcoming tip changes in the next merge window.
> >
> > Could you advise how this patch should proceed?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > ]
>
> Indeed, Peter how do you want to handle this?
I think Alexei suggested that we merge the one patch in two branches and
let git sort it out. I _think_ I've done something similar before and it
worked.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists