lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171005083437.v3yfluazdy5du7pi@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:34:37 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     yhs@...com, rostedt@...dmis.org, ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] bpf: add two helpers to read perf event
 enabled/running time

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 04:00:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 15:42:14 -0700
> 
> > [Dave, Peter,
> > 
> >  Previous communcation shows that this patch may potentially have
> >  merge conflict with upcoming tip changes in the next merge window.
> > 
> >  Could you advise how this patch should proceed?
> > 
> >  Thanks!
> > ]
> 
> Indeed, Peter how do you want to handle this?

I think Alexei suggested that we merge the one patch in two branches and
let git sort it out. I _think_ I've done something similar before and it
worked.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ