[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171007.232036.1361815658002685993.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 23:20:36 +0100 (WEST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ptalbert@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] [net] bonding: Add NUMA notice
From: Patrick Talbert <ptalbert@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:23:45 -0400
> Network performance can suffer when a load balancing bond uses slave
> interfaces which are in different NUMA domains.
>
> This compares the NUMA domain of a newly enslaved interface against any
> existing enslaved interfaces and prints a warning if they do not match.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Talbert <ptalbert@...hat.com>
This is a bit over the top, and doesn't even handle cases where
the device has no specific NUMA node (-1).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists