[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171007.232911.831489164694199337.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 23:29:11 +0100 (WEST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ast@...com
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, ecree@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bpf: fix liveness marking
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:20:56 -0700
> while processing Rx = Ry instruction the verifier does
> regs[insn->dst_reg] = regs[insn->src_reg]
> which often clears write mark (when Ry doesn't have it)
> that was just set by check_reg_arg(Rx) prior to the assignment.
> That causes mark_reg_read() to keep marking Rx in this block as
> REG_LIVE_READ (since the logic incorrectly misses that it's
> screened by the write) and in many of its parents (until lucky
> write into the same Rx or beginning of the program).
> That causes is_state_visited() logic to miss many pruning opportunities.
>
> Furthermore mark_reg_read() logic propagates the read mark
> for BPF_REG_FP as well (though it's readonly) which causes
> harmless but unnecssary work during is_state_visited().
> Note that do_propagate_liveness() skips FP correctly,
> so do the same in mark_reg_read() as well.
> It saves 0.2 seconds for the test below
>
> program before after
> bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 2604 2304
> bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 11159 3723
> bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1116 1110
> bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 34566 28004
> bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 53267 39026
> bpf_netdev.o 17843 16943
> bpf_overlay.o 8672 7929
> time ~11 sec ~4 sec
>
> Fixes: dc503a8ad984 ("bpf/verifier: track liveness for pruning")
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Looks great, applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists