lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93AF473E2DA327428DE3D46B72B1E9FD4112EE49@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2017 18:40:15 +0000
From:   <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>
To:     <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
CC:     <muvarov@...il.com>, <nathan.leigh.conrad@...il.com>,
        <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
        <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <pavel@....cz>,
        <ruediger.schmitt@...lips.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 RFC 1/7] Replace license with GPL

> From: Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com
> > Sent: 06 October 2017 21:33
> > Replace license with GPL.
> 
> Don't you need permission from all the people who have updated
> the files in order to make this change?
> 
> 	David

I am a little confused by your comment.  The 4 original KSZ9477 DSA
driver files were written by Woojung at Microchip Technology Inc.
There was a complaint the "AS IS" license is not exactly GPL.

It should be submitted formally to net-next instead of a RFC, but it
is probably pointless to do that when there is no code change.

I am hoping these drastic changes of KSZ9477 driver can be accepted
so that the patches can be submitted formally to net-next.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ