[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93AF473E2DA327428DE3D46B72B1E9FD4112EE49@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 18:40:15 +0000
From: <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>
To: <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
CC: <muvarov@...il.com>, <nathan.leigh.conrad@...il.com>,
<vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
<f.fainelli@...il.com>, <pavel@....cz>,
<ruediger.schmitt@...lips.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 RFC 1/7] Replace license with GPL
> From: Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com
> > Sent: 06 October 2017 21:33
> > Replace license with GPL.
>
> Don't you need permission from all the people who have updated
> the files in order to make this change?
>
> David
I am a little confused by your comment. The 4 original KSZ9477 DSA
driver files were written by Woojung at Microchip Technology Inc.
There was a complaint the "AS IS" license is not exactly GPL.
It should be submitted formally to net-next instead of a RFC, but it
is probably pointless to do that when there is no code change.
I am hoping these drastic changes of KSZ9477 driver can be accepted
so that the patches can be submitted formally to net-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists