lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 09:16:39 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] xfrm: don't call xfrm_policy_cache_flush under xfrm_state_lock From: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com> I might be wrong but it doesn't look like xfrm_state_lock is required for xfrm_policy_cache_flush and calling it under this lock triggers both "sleeping function called from invalid context" and "possible circular locking dependency detected" warnings on flush. Fixes: ec30d78c14a8 xfrm: add xdst pcpu cache Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com> Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> --- net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c index 0dab1cd..1221347 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c @@ -732,12 +732,12 @@ int xfrm_state_flush(struct net *net, u8 proto, bool task_valid) } } } +out: + spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock); if (cnt) { err = 0; xfrm_policy_cache_flush(); } -out: - spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock); return err; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_flush); -- 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists