[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1507533399-29399-5-git-send-email-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 09:16:39 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] xfrm: don't call xfrm_policy_cache_flush under xfrm_state_lock
From: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
I might be wrong but it doesn't look like xfrm_state_lock is required
for xfrm_policy_cache_flush and calling it under this lock triggers both
"sleeping function called from invalid context" and "possible circular
locking dependency detected" warnings on flush.
Fixes: ec30d78c14a8 xfrm: add xdst pcpu cache
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index 0dab1cd..1221347 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -732,12 +732,12 @@ int xfrm_state_flush(struct net *net, u8 proto, bool task_valid)
}
}
}
+out:
+ spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
if (cnt) {
err = 0;
xfrm_policy_cache_flush();
}
-out:
- spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_flush);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists