[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:55:27 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][net-next] ipv6: fix incorrect bitwise operator used on rt6i_flags
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The use of the | operator always leads to true on the expression
(rt->rt6i_flags | RTF_CACHE) which looks rather suspect to me. I
believe this is fixed by using & instead to just check the
RTF_CACHE entry bit.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1457747 ("Wrong operator used")
Fixes: 35732d01fe31 ("ipv6: introduce a hash table to store dst cache")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 6db1541eaa7b..0556d1ee189c 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ int rt6_remove_exception_rt(struct rt6_info *rt)
int err;
if (!from ||
- !(rt->rt6i_flags | RTF_CACHE))
+ !(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_CACHE))
return -EINVAL;
if (!rcu_access_pointer(from->rt6i_exception_bucket))
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists