[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:04:43 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
mlxsw <mlxsw@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 3/4] net: sched: convert cls_flower->egress_dev
users to tc_setup_cb_egdev infra
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> --- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h
> +++ b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
> @@ -206,8 +206,6 @@ int tcf_exts_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_exts *exts);
> int tcf_exts_dump_stats(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_exts *exts);
> int tcf_exts_get_dev(struct net_device *dev, struct tcf_exts *exts,
> struct net_device **hw_dev);
> -int tcf_exts_egdev_cb_call(struct tcf_exts *exts, enum tc_setup_type type,
> - void *type_data, bool err_stop);
but this (and another 1-2 hunks below) were set by upstream patch of
this series, did you do that add/del on purpose? is that for
bisection? if not why?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists