[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:13:57 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
mlxsw <mlxsw@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/4] net: sched: get rid of
cls_flower->egress_dev
Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:24:21PM CEST, gerlitz.or@...il.com wrote:
>Jiri,
>
>FWIW, as I reported to you earlier, I was playing with tc encap/decap rules
>on 4.14-rc+ (net) before
>applying any patch of this series, and something is messy w.r.t to decap
>rules. I don't see
>them removed at all when user space attempts to do so. It might (probably)
>mlx5 bug, which
>we will have to fix for net and later rebase net-next over net. We have
>short WW here so
>I will not be able to do RCA this week.
Or, as I replied to you earlier, the issue you describe is totally
unrelated to this patchset as you see the issue with the current net-next.
Not sure why you add this comment here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists