lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7501028d-4433-3a08-3a11-4a8b7c0e1404@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:35:35 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        Hangbin Liu <haliu@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 iproute2 2/2] lib/libnetlink: update rtnl_talk to
 support malloc buff at run time

On 10/11/17 5:10 AM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> less than 10% overall. Given the short time a single call to 'ip'
> typically takes, I don't think the difference is noticeable even in
> highly performance critical applications.

high performance critical applications should not be forking ip and
definitely not for 1 command at a time.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ