netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] Add other KSZ switch support so that patch check does not complain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:18:02 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Ruediger Schmitt <ruediger.schmitt@...lips.com>
Cc:     muvarov@...il.com, nathan.leigh.conrad@...il.com,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Add other KSZ switch support so that patch check does
 not complain

On 10/06/2017 01:33 PM, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com wrote:
> From: Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>
> 
> Add other KSZ switch support so that patch check does not complain.

You are not doing this just so checkpatch.pl stops complaining, what you
are doing here is to properly document the possible models supported by
this binding document.

Please also use a proper subject for this patch:

dt-bindings: dsa: Document additional Micrel KSZ family switches

or something along those lines.

With that:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
-- 
Florian