netdev - Re: [patch net-next 0/4] net: sched: get rid of cls_flower->egress

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171011064446.GA2039@nanopsycho>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:44:46 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        mlxsw <mlxsw@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/4] net: sched: get rid of
 cls_flower->egress_dev

Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:46:22PM CEST, gerlitz.or@...il.com wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>> Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:24:21PM CEST, gerlitz.or@...il.com wrote:
>
>> Or, as I replied to you earlier, the issue you describe is totally
>> unrelated to this patchset as you see the issue with the current net-next.
>
>Jiri, the point I wanted to make that if indeed there's a bug in mlx5
>or flower, we will have to fix it for 4.14 and then these bits would
>have to be rebased when net-next is re-planted over net, I put "FWIW"
>before that, so maybe it doesn't W so much, we'll see.

The fix is still unrelated to this patchset.