netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: qcom/emac: enforce DMA address restrictions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4f0055bb-894f-8fe1-b2d3-b6541dbb07a7@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:15:12 -0500
From:   Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     David.Laight@...LAB.COM, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: qcom/emac: enforce DMA address restrictions

On 10/12/2017 11:58 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure that kzalloc does not make that guarantee, and I don't
>> think dma_alloc_coherent does either.
> Both make that guarantee, even when an IOMMU is used.
> 

Ok, Dave, then can you drop this patch?

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.  Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.