[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1507830124-19294-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:42:04 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David.Laight@...LAB.COM
Cc: timur@...eaurora.org
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "net: qcom/emac: enforce DMA address restrictions"
This reverts commit df1ec1b9d0df57e96011f175418dc95b1af46821.
It turns out that memory allocated via dma_alloc_coherent is always
aligned to the size of the buffer, so there's no way the RRD and RFD
can ever be in separate 32-bit regions.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-mac.c | 39 +++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-mac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-mac.c
index 0f5ece5d9507..9cbb27263742 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-mac.c
@@ -734,11 +734,6 @@ static int emac_rx_descs_alloc(struct emac_adapter *adpt)
rx_q->rrd.size = rx_q->rrd.count * (adpt->rrd_size * 4);
rx_q->rfd.size = rx_q->rfd.count * (adpt->rfd_size * 4);
- /* Check if the RRD and RFD are aligned properly, and if not, adjust. */
- if (upper_32_bits(ring_header->dma_addr) !=
- upper_32_bits(ring_header->dma_addr + ALIGN(rx_q->rrd.size, 8)))
- ring_header->used = ALIGN(rx_q->rrd.size, 8);
-
rx_q->rrd.dma_addr = ring_header->dma_addr + ring_header->used;
rx_q->rrd.v_addr = ring_header->v_addr + ring_header->used;
ring_header->used += ALIGN(rx_q->rrd.size, 8);
@@ -772,18 +767,11 @@ int emac_mac_rx_tx_rings_alloc_all(struct emac_adapter *adpt)
/* Ring DMA buffer. Each ring may need up to 8 bytes for alignment,
* hence the additional padding bytes are allocated.
- *
- * Also double the memory allocated for the RRD so that we can
- * re-align it if necessary. The EMAC has a restriction that the
- * upper 32 bits of the base addresses for the RFD and RRD rings
- * must be the same. It is extremely unlikely that this is not the
- * case, since the rings are only a few KB in size. However, we
- * need to check for this anyway, and if the two rings are not
- * compliant, then we re-align.
*/
- ring_header->size = ALIGN(num_tx_descs * (adpt->tpd_size * 4), 8) +
- ALIGN(num_rx_descs * (adpt->rfd_size * 4), 8) +
- ALIGN(num_rx_descs * (adpt->rrd_size * 4), 8) * 2;
+ ring_header->size = num_tx_descs * (adpt->tpd_size * 4) +
+ num_rx_descs * (adpt->rfd_size * 4) +
+ num_rx_descs * (adpt->rrd_size * 4) +
+ 8 + 2 * 8; /* 8 byte per one Tx and two Rx rings */
ring_header->used = 0;
ring_header->v_addr = dma_zalloc_coherent(dev, ring_header->size,
@@ -792,23 +780,26 @@ int emac_mac_rx_tx_rings_alloc_all(struct emac_adapter *adpt)
if (!ring_header->v_addr)
return -ENOMEM;
- ret = emac_rx_descs_alloc(adpt);
- if (ret) {
- netdev_err(adpt->netdev, "error: Rx Queue alloc failed\n");
- goto err_alloc_rx;
- }
+ ring_header->used = ALIGN(ring_header->dma_addr, 8) -
+ ring_header->dma_addr;
ret = emac_tx_q_desc_alloc(adpt, &adpt->tx_q);
if (ret) {
- netdev_err(adpt->netdev, "transmit queue allocation failed\n");
+ netdev_err(adpt->netdev, "error: Tx Queue alloc failed\n");
goto err_alloc_tx;
}
+ ret = emac_rx_descs_alloc(adpt);
+ if (ret) {
+ netdev_err(adpt->netdev, "error: Rx Queue alloc failed\n");
+ goto err_alloc_rx;
+ }
+
return 0;
-err_alloc_tx:
- emac_rx_q_bufs_free(adpt);
err_alloc_rx:
+ emac_tx_q_bufs_free(adpt);
+err_alloc_tx:
dma_free_coherent(dev, ring_header->size,
ring_header->v_addr, ring_header->dma_addr);
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists