[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171012105216.GF26835@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:52:16 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: rtnetlink: add a small macsec test
case
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net> wrote:
> 2017-10-12, 11:11:22 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
>
> Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Thanks for reviewing.
> Just a small detail: the "ip macsec" commands actually use genetlink
> and not rtnetlink.
Right, but it implements rtnl link ops so it ends up
interacting with rtnetlink too...
I also added sysfs-based change of device aliases to this script,
and I'm sure I will end up adding test cases that interact with
rtnetlink via ioctl, setsockopts and so on.
rtnl_lock() is all over the place so I think it makes sense to
cover as much callsites/call paths as possible even if the entry
point is not via rtnetlink socket.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists