lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171013101806.vqcbv2sop2r4wsrk@sirena.co.uk>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:18:06 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Allen Pais <allen.lkml@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the FIXME tree

Hi Doug,

Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/catas.c

between commit:

  d2a0012e7632a5 ("drivers: net: mlx4: use setup_timer() helper.")

from the net-next tree and commit:

  55c0fcc3de4605 ("net/mlx4_core: Convert timers to use timer_setup()")

from the rdma tree.

I fixed it up by taking the second commit and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ