[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1507995761.31614.56.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 08:42:41 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Koichiro Den <den@...ipeden.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [net-next 1/3] tcp: avoid useless copying and collapsing of
just one skb
On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 16:27 +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> On the starting point chosen, it could be possible that just one skb
> remains in between the range provided, leading to copying and re-insertion
> of rb node, which is useless with respect to the rcv buf measurement.
> This is rather probable in ooo queue case, in which non-contiguous bloated
> packets have been queued up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@...ipeden.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index d0682ce2a5d6..1d785b5bf62d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -4807,7 +4807,8 @@ tcp_collapse(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff_head *list, struct rb_root *root,
> start = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
> }
> if (end_of_skbs ||
> - (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & (TCPHDR_SYN | TCPHDR_FIN)))
> + (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & (TCPHDR_SYN | TCPHDR_FIN)) ||
> + (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == start && TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == end))
> return;
>
> __skb_queue_head_init(&tmp);
What do you mean by useless ?
Surely if this skb contains 17 segments (some USB drivers allocate 8KB
per frame), we want to collapse them to save memory.
So I do not agree with this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists