lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171014200706.GA24477@lunn.ch>
Date:   Sat, 14 Oct 2017 22:07:06 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Ruediger Schmitt <ruediger.schmitt@...lips.com>,
        muvarov@...il.com, nathan.leigh.conrad@...il.com,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 RFC 6/7] Add MIB counter reading support

> +static void ksz9477_phy_setup(struct ksz_device *dev, int port,
> +			      struct phy_device *phy)
> +{
> +	if (port < dev->phy_port_cnt) {
> +		/* SUPPORTED_Asym_Pause and SUPPORTED_Pause can be removed to
> +		 * disable flow control when rate limiting is used.
> +		 */
> +		phy->advertising = phy->supported;
> +	}
> +}
> +

This has nothing to do with MIBs. It does not belong in this patch.

>  static void ksz9477_port_setup(struct ksz_device *dev, int port, bool cpu_port)
>  {
>  	u8 data8;
> @@ -1159,6 +1198,8 @@ static int ksz9477_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>  	/* start switch */
>  	ksz_cfg(dev, REG_SW_OPERATION, SW_START, true);
>  
> +	ksz_init_mib_timer(dev);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1168,6 +1209,7 @@ static int ksz9477_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>  	.set_addr		= ksz9477_set_addr,
>  	.phy_read		= ksz9477_phy_read16,
>  	.phy_write		= ksz9477_phy_write16,
> +	.adjust_link		= ksz_adjust_link,

Please move the adjust_link changes into a separate patch.

I need to come back at look at the mutex's and the freeze code. It is
not obviously correct, and i don't have the time at the moment.

       Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ