netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/10] korina cleanups/optimizations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171015.140548.812014928035930297.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sun, 15 Oct 2017 14:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     roman@...em.lv
Cc:     f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/10] korina cleanups/optimizations

From: Roman Yeryomin <roman@...em.lv>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 19:46:02 +0300

> On 2017-10-15 19:38, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On October 15, 2017 9:22:26 AM PDT, Roman Yeryomin <roman@...em.lv>
>> wrote:
>>> TX optimizations have led to ~15% performance increase (35->40Mbps)
>>> in local tx usecase (tested with iperf v3.2).
>> Could you avoid empty commit messages and write a paragraph or two for
>> each commit that explains what and why are you changing? The changes
>> look fine but they lack any explanation.
> 
> I thought that short descriptions are already self explanatory and
> just didn't know what to write more.

"Optimize TX handlers."

In what way?  Why?  How are things improved?  Is it measurable?
etc.