[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a783ef9d-e66c-b906-fcfd-4da5d560af9d@6wind.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:20:27 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, hannes@...essinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 5/6] rtnetlink: check DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY correctly in
do_setlink
Le 16/10/2017 à 03:17, David Ahern a écrit :
> [ cc'ed Nicolas ]
>
> On 10/15/17 4:13 AM, Xin Long wrote:
>> The check 'status & DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY' in do_setlink doesn't really
>> work after status & DO_SETLINK_MODIFIED, as:
>>
>> DO_SETLINK_MODIFIED 0x1
>> DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY 0x3
>>
>> Considering that notifications are suppposed to be sent only when
>> status have the flag DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY, the right check would be:
>>
>> (status & DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY) == DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY
>>
>> This would avoid lots of duplicated notifications when setting some
>> properties of a link.
>>
>> Fixes: ba9989069f4e ("rtnl/do_setlink(): notify when a netdev is modified")
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Good catch, thank you.
Acked-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists