netdev - Re: [patch net-next 27/34] nfp: bpf: Convert ndo_setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171017124812.GH2112@nanopsycho>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:48:12 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 27/34] nfp: bpf: Convert ndo_setup_tc offloads
 to block callbacks

Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:08:24AM CEST, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 19:18:16 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c
>> index a88bb5b..9e9af88 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c
>> @@ -246,6 +246,10 @@ int nfp_net_bpf_offload(struct nfp_net *nn, struct tc_cls_bpf_offload *cls_bpf)
>>  	void *code;
>>  	int err;
>>  
>> +	if (cls_bpf->common.protocol != htons(ETH_P_ALL) ||
>> +	    cls_bpf->common.chain_index)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>>  	max_instr = nn_readw(nn, NFP_NET_CFG_BPF_MAX_LEN);
>>  
>>  	switch (cls_bpf->command) {
>
>It is certainly very ugly but I send a fake struct tc_cls_bpf_offload
>here for XDP.  Refactoring this mess is pretty high on my priority list
>but one way or the other this function will be called from XDP so TC
>checks must stay in the TC handler... :(

Okay. But currently, why is it a problem? You don't need the checks for
xdp path.