netdev - Re: [PATCH net] sctp: do not peel off an assoc from one netns to another one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171017162458.GA5357@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:24:58 -0200
From:   Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:     network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        chunwang@...hat.com, syzkaller@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: do not peel off an assoc from one netns to
 another one

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:26:10PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> Now when peeling off an association to the sock in another netns, all
> transports in this assoc are not to be rehashed and keep use the old
> key in hashtable.
> 
> As a transport uses sk->net as the hash key to insert into hashtable,
> it would miss removing these transports from hashtable due to the new
> netns when closing the sock and all transports are being freeed, then
> later an use-after-free issue could be caused when looking up an asoc
> and dereferencing those transports.
> 
> This is a very old issue since very beginning, ChunYu found it with
> syzkaller fuzz testing with this series:
> 
>   socket$inet6_sctp()
>   bind$inet6()
>   sendto$inet6()
>   unshare(0x40000000)
>   getsockopt$inet_sctp6_SCTP_GET_ASSOC_ID_LIST()
>   getsockopt$inet_sctp6_SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF()
> 
> This patch is to block this call when peeling one assoc off from one
> netns to another one, so that the netns of all transport would not
> go out-sync with the key in hashtable.
> 
> Note that this patch didn't fix it by rehashing transports, as it's
> difficult to handle the situation when the tuple is already in use
> in the new netns. Besides, no one would like to peel off one assoc
> to another netns, considering ipaddrs, ifaces, etc. are usually
> different.
> 
> Reported-by: ChunYu Wang <chunwang@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>

Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>

> ---
>  net/sctp/socket.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index d4730ad..17841ab 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -4906,6 +4906,10 @@ int sctp_do_peeloff(struct sock *sk, sctp_assoc_t id, struct socket **sockp)
>  	struct socket *sock;
>  	int err = 0;
>  
> +	/* Do not peel off from one netns to another one. */
> +	if (!net_eq(current->nsproxy->net_ns, sock_net(sk)))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	if (!asoc)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>